New York · Bill
New York's bills on intoxication and consent
Bench Watch Brief · Where it stands
Under New York's sex-crime definitions, a person who took drugs or alcohol on their own doesn't count as “mentally incapacitated,” which covers a substance only when it was given without consent. Three bills that passed the state Senate would change how the law treats intoxication and consent. All three are waiting in the Assembly's Codes Committee.
What it does
Today, New York defines “mentally incapacitated” as being under the influence of a substance “administered to him without his consent,” and “physically helpless” as being unconscious or “physically unable to communicate unwillingness” (Penal Law 130.00).
S54A, sponsored by Sen. Nathalia Fernandez, would add a new way to show lack of consent for certain charges, including sexual misconduct and some third-degree rape charges. It would cover a victim clearly under the influence of a drug, intoxicant or other substance to a degree that left them unable to control their conduct and unable to clearly express lack of consent, when that condition “was known or reasonably should have been known to a person in the actor's situation.” It passed the Senate 58-0 on April 28, 2026, and is in the Assembly Codes Committee (S54A).
S10632, also sponsored by Fernandez, “prohibits the use of intoxication of the victim as a defense in sex crimes.” It would add another circumstance that shows lack of consent, covering a victim under the influence of a substance “to a degree which rendered the victim temporarily incapable of appraising or controlling such person's conduct,” when that condition was known or reasonably should have been known to a person in the actor's situation. It passed the Senate 60-0 on June 4, 2026. Its Assembly version, A101, sponsored by Asm. Jeffrey Dinowitz, is in the Assembly Codes Committee (S10632; A101; A101 on the Assembly's site).
S866, sponsored by Sen. Jamaal Bailey, would redefine “physically helpless” to cover a person who is physically unable to communicate “affirmative consent,” which the bill defines as “a knowing, voluntary, and mutual decision among all participants to engage in sexual activity.” It passed the Senate 59-0 on Feb. 5, 2026, and is in the Assembly Codes Committee. The Senate also passed it 61-0 on March 27, 2025, but it died in the Assembly (S866).
Why it matters
In the Cornell Chi Phi case, Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten said the woman's 2024 sworn statement didn't meet New York's legal definition of lack of consent, which includes these definitions, so no charges could be filed (DA's statement). No one has been charged in that case, and the men named in her civil lawsuit deny wrongdoing (ABC News). Gov. Hochul said, “I support closing this loophole and will work with the New York State Legislature to accomplish this” (transcript). Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie announced a work group of Assembly members to examine the state's laws (WWNY).
The cases behind it
Video · NBC NewsCivilPretrialJane Doe v. Cornell University, et al.
N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. County · No. Index No. 161704/2026
A former Cornell student's civil lawsuit alleges that seven fraternity members sexually assaulted her at the Chi Phi house in October 2024. The allegations haven't been tested in court, and all seven men deny wrongdoing. Tompkins County prosecutors declined to charge in 2024. The DA reopened the case in September 2026, and the governor then made the attorney general special prosecutor. No one has been charged.
Updated November 14, 2026 · 4 min read
Timeline
Sources
- S54AOther
- S10632Other
- A101Other
- S866Other
- Penal Law 130.00Statute
- A101 on the Assembly's siteOther
- Tompkins County DA's statementOther · September 28, 2026
- Governor's news conference transcriptOther · October 2, 2026
- WWNY: lawmakers call for changeOther · October 1, 2026
- ABC News: the men deny wrongdoingOther · October 25, 2026
