Skip to content
Bench WatchClosing the gap between the courtroom and everyday life.

Need help now? Free, confidential help lines, 24/7. Get help

Judge tracker

Judge Jeannine N. Pratt's record in serious criminal cases

About the judge

Jeannine N. Pratt

Judge, Miami County Court of Common Pleas, General Division

Jeannine N. Pratt has been a judge of the Miami County Court of Common Pleas in Troy, Ohio, since February 2015, after 18 years as a county assistant prosecutor. She presided over the 2026 murder trial of Caleb Flynn and on Oct. 5, 2026, sentenced him to life in prison without parole. She was re-elected without opposition Nov. 3, 2026.

Elected; on the bench since 2015

Full profile

Bench Watch Brief · What the data shows

Bench Watch logs the sentences Judge Jeannine N. Pratt of Miami County Common Pleas Court has imposed in serious criminal cases since she took the bench in 2015, from court opinions and news reports. It isn't a complete record. In the nine cases logged so far, she went above a sentence prosecutors and the defense jointly recommended once, followed a joint recommendation twice, and went above the prosecution's recommendation once.

9 entries · select a column to sort

Bench Watch Data

Get the data

Judge Jeannine N. Pratt's record in serious criminal cases

You'll also get the free Bench Watch newsletter. Unsubscribe anytime. You must be 13 or older. See our privacy policy and terms.

Source
2026Election yearCaleb C. FlynnSentence: aggravated murder and 8 other counts (jury trial)Life without parole, after 16 years on other countsThe harshest of the four sentences Ohio law lists for aggravated murder without a death-penalty specification; LOCAL 12 called it mandatory in this caseSourceCase file
2022Joshua A. MizeSentence: involuntary manslaughter in a 1-year-old's death, and other counts (guilty plea)18 to 23.5 yearsAbove the prosecution's original recommendation in the plea deal (15 to 18 years)Source
2022Britaney N. KirchgessnerSentence: aggravated vehicular manslaughter; impaired driving (no-contest plea)7 to 10.5 yearsBelow the maximum (12 years)Source
2021A Miami County man (name withheld to protect a child)Sentence: rape of a child under 13 (10 counts) (guilty plea)20 years to lifeAbove the jointly recommended 10 years to lifeSource
2019A Miami County man (name withheld to protect a child)Sentence: rape; sexual battery (no-contest plea)11 yearsTop of the range on the rape count; terms run concurrently, as the parties jointly recommendedSource
2018Nathan DotsonSentence: attempted felonious assault (guilty plea)30 monthsBelow the maximum (36 months)Source
2017A Miami County man (name withheld to protect a child)Sentence: sexual battery (2 counts) (bench trial)8 years (two 4-year terms, consecutive)Maximum not stated in the opinionSource
2016A Miami County man (name withheld to protect a child)Sentence: rape of a child under 13 (3 counts) (guilty plea)20 years to lifeNo recommendation reportedSource
2016A Miami County man (name withheld to protect a child)Sentence: rape of a child under 13 (2 counts) (guilty plea)18 yearsFollowed the jointly recommended sentenceSource

How we built this

This tracker counts Judge Pratt's sentences and key rulings in serious criminal cases, meaning homicide, sex crimes and other violent felonies, and major federal crimes, plus rulings in cases Bench Watch follows. The goal is to cover the judge's whole time on the bench, so we log the most recent five years first, then work back, and the “Covers” line shows the years logged so far. Each row links to its source, whether a court record, an appeals opinion, an official release or a news report.

This is not a complete record. Ohio does not publish sentencing data by judge. Appeals opinions stopped naming the trial judge in 2023, and the state's sentencing data platform does not include Miami County and leaves judges anonymous. A full count would mean pulling cases one by one from the Miami County Clerk of Courts docket. Bench Watch adds decisions as it confirms them.

We leave “What each side asked” blank when the source didn't report it. “Compared with the options” sets the decision against what the law allowed, the sentencing guidelines and any joint recommendation, as reported in the source. We don't name victims. When naming a defendant would identify a child victim, we withhold the name.