Issue tracker
Michigan's untested rape kits, by the numbers

Bench Watch Brief · What the data shows
Bench Watch logs the official numbers on Michigan's previously untested rape kits, including how many were found, tested and prosecuted, by date and by who reported them. The sources don't always agree, so we show each figure with its date and source, not as a trend.
10 entries · select a column to sort
| Source | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-08-17 | Kits found in Detroit police storage | 11,341, collected 1984–2009 | Wayne County Prosecutor | Source |
| 2009-11-01 | Kits counted in Detroit police storage | 11,303, revised to 11,219 | NIJ-funded research census | Source |
| 2015-12-01 | Kits tested in the research sample | 1,595 tested; 785 DNA profiles eligible for CODIS; 455 CODIS hits; 127 serial sexual assaults identified | NIJ-funded research report | Source |
| 2016-01-28 | Untested kits found outside Wayne County | 1,819 | Attorney General's survey (Michigan Public) | Source |
| 2018-08-01 | Previously untested kits submitted statewide | 3,440 | Michigan State Police | Source |
| 2022-11-16 | Detroit kits tested | All 11,341; 239 convictions; 841 serial offenders | Wayne County Prosecutor (FOX 2) | Source |
| 2024-09-10 | Detroit convictions and serial offenders | 257 convictions; 853 suspected serial rapists in 39 states | CBS Detroit | Source |
| 2026-02-02 | Ingham County SAKI | 125 kits tested; 7 felony convictions; 63 cases closed | Attorney General's report | Source |
| 2026-02-02 | Kalamazoo County SAKI | 221 cases; 22 convictions; 2 acquittals | Attorney General's report | Source |
| 2026-04-10 | Attorney General's SAKI counties, combined | More than 600 cases; 55 convictions; 42 active investigations | Attorney General | Source |
How we built this
We count figures published by prosecutors, the attorney general, the Michigan State Police or the National Institute of Justice-funded research on Detroit's kits, along with news reports quoting those offices. Each row links to its source.
The numbers differ because offices count at different times and in different ways (kits found vs. kits tested, cases vs. kits, convictions as of different dates). We show each figure as reported rather than combine them.
We never name or identify a survivor.
